The ADRR

The American Downtown Revitalization Review

Main menu

Skip to content
  • The Current Issue
  • Past issues
  • About
  • The ADRR Authors
  • The ADRR Board
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Contact

Post navigation

← THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: a Downtown Toolkit
Lessons on Reinventing New York: How the NYC Housing Partnership’s New Homes Program Can Inform Hotel-to-Housing Conversions →

Article

RESEARCH NOTE: Our Downtowns Have a Lot of Experience with Converting Older Office Buildings to Residential Uses

October 12, 2021

Paul Levy, Center City District, Philadelphia

The rise in remote work caused by the pandemic has sparked considerable interest in converting older and less competitive downtown office buildings into residential uses. Many downtowns have a rich history in successfully making such conversions, and those new to such ventures can certainly learn much from them.

For example, the transformation of lower Manhattan really began in the mid-1990s when Carl Weisbrod formed the Alliance for Downtown NY BID with the stated purpose of converting thousands of square feet of vacant office space to residential and early tech use. It just so happened that the obsolete and vacant 1920s inventory laid out remarkable well for housing. 9/11 was indeed a disastrous set-back, but they already had a growing residential population to rebuild from. Carl certainly inspired us here in Philadelphia and we quickly passed a 10-year tax abatement bill in 1997 for the explicit purpose of converting vacant office and industrial buildings to residential use. This was largely an inventory built between 1885 and 1932. We are now approaching 200 such buildings converted in the core of our downtown to either housing or hotels. The same inventory has been converted in cities as diverse as Baltimore, Cleveland, Chicago, St Louis, Dallas, Minneapolis and Los Angeles.  I think a real issue today may be that not all 1980s and 1990 office buildings convert as easily as the 1880s-1920s inventory that, even when steel framed, had much higher ceilings, larger windows and heavy concrete floors. The masonry load bearing structures are even better for housing, for tech and now lab space. Philadelphia is a slow growth city that rarely explodes with new office development the way San Francisco and Seattle do. Sometimes it may help to be a tortoise.

For those wanting more detailed information about such conversions, CLICK HERE for the 1996 analysis that we did of older buildings. CLICK HERE  for the 1997 tax abatement bill that resulted from that analysis

 

Jump to Top
This entry was posted in Central Social Districts, Downtown Redevelopment, Housing. Bookmark the permalink.

Post navigation

← THE WAY WE LIVE NOW: a Downtown Toolkit
Lessons on Reinventing New York: How the NYC Housing Partnership’s New Homes Program Can Inform Hotel-to-Housing Conversions →

BACK TO TOP

83-85 116th Street, Ste 3D
Kew Gardens, NY  11418
Phone: (718) 805-9507
danthinc@yahoo.com

Copyright © ndavidmilder.com

Receive New Issues

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.